South Carolina again faces showdown over school vouchers
COLUMBIA, S.C. (AP) — The South Carolina House approved its own version of a bill Wednesday that would let parents spend taxpayer money on private school tuition.
After a routine final vote Thursday, the bill will go back to the state Senate, which can either accept the House version or work on a compromise. The version ed by the Senate would fund the vouchers through state lottery profits, whereas the House version would allocate money from the regular budget.
If the two chambers can solve their differences, a bigger showdown looms. The General Assembly ed a similar bill in 2023 that the state Supreme Court struck down. The justices pointed out in their 3-2 decision that the state constitution bans public funds from being used for the direct benefit of private or religious schools.
Hearts ache in Gloverville for 2 kids who died in house fire
Neighbors are left shocked after two children were killed in a home fire across from Gloverville Park on Monday.
The state Senate hopes that using lottery proceeds to fund the private school funding might sway the court. The House version would put the money in the hands of a trustee in the state Education Department to dole out, which ers believe would not run afoul of the constitutional limits, since the money would go through someone’s hands before getting to parents.
“That trustee somehow magically makes those public funds not public any more,” said state Rep. Neal Collins, an Easley Republican who was one of five of his party to oppose the bill because he said public money doesn’t need to go to private schools.
“You really have to do some mental gymnastics to think this public money is not public money,” Collins said.
The state House voted 79-38 in favor of the bill.
MORE FROM NEWS 12
South Carolina: Latest from the State House
- S.C. continues $1.8 billion ing error investigation amid financial controversy
- S.C. attorney general set to file motion over disability law
- Officials push for utility choice after study of S.C. power grid
- McMaster nominates new lead of South Carolina’s military department
- Tax cuts could be coming for South Carolina boat owners
- Lawsuit reform bill ‘doesn’t benefit any S.C. citizen,’ attorney says
South Carolina is trying to about 15 other states that allow public money to be used on private school tuitions. Several other states offer tax credits for private school expenses.
Allowing parents to spend public money on private schools in South Carolina has been a two-decade effort running through three governors, four House speakers and five education superintendents in a state where Republicans have been consolidating and expanding their power.
The House bill ed Wednesday would set aside $30 million for what the proposal calls education scholarships.
Is S.C. raw milk OK to drink? Here’s what regional doctors say
If you’ve been on social media recently, you’re probably aware of the ever-popular trend of drinking raw milk in South and North Carolina.
Scholarships of up to $6,000 would be offered per school year, with the amount rising as the amount the state spends per pupil increases. Eligibly would be limited to families making 300% or less of the federal poverty level, meaning the cutoff would be about $100,000 for a family of four. Money could be spent on tuition, tutoring or equipment.
Republicans knocked down a proposed change to the bill by Democrats that would have required private schools that accept public money to have open enrollment policies including accepting students with disabilities and not barring students based on race, religion or sexual orientation.
Another killed proposal would have mandated transportation for poor students who want to go to a private school more than 10 miles (16 kilometers) from their home.
S.C. woman visits every state to raise awareness of breast cancer
The American Cancer Society said there is a one in eight chance that a woman in the United States will be diagnosed with breast cancer in their lifetime.
“This isn’t about giving everybody choice. This bill isn’t about being fair to everybody in the state,” Democratic state Rep. Justin Bamberg said. “This bill is about excluding certain people. This bill is about looking out for a small segment of folks in this state at the expense of everyone else.”
There is one solution that wouldn’t require a nervous wait for a state Supreme Court ruling. The Republican supermajority in the General Assembly could get two-thirds for a proposed constitutional amendment to be put before voters. But ers don’t seem confident they could get a majority vote with the public.
Republican state Rep. David Martin suggested creating a workaround instead of an amendment was not the right solution and that allowing parents with six-figure salaries to get money for private education was not the way to try and help students from poor families.
“This is only going to be free money for rich people,” Martin said.
Tennessee expanded voucher access earlier this month while Texas is considering starting its own program. Shortly after taking office, President Donald Trump signed an executive order telling federal officials to use discretionary money to prioritize school choice programs.
Copyright 2025 WRDW/WAGT. All rights reserved.
